…this is not magic, but art – you say – something straight out of the real
In the last few weeks, alongside the work we’ve been doing to select pieces for the next Unpsychology Magazine (Edges), to be published in the summer, there have also been some really interesting currents and conversations swirling around.
As well as the bubbly processes of creating and curating themselves (see our recent posts ‘creating together’ and ‘what matters is already here’), we have also been edging into conversations around some of the key phenomena of our times – chaos, soul, warm data and how to ‘stay with the trouble’ - to use Donna Haraway’s phrase.1
In February we also published an essay, long in the making - Making Soul - part of my own ongoing exploration of ‘soul’ as a metaphor (or something more, depending on your way of thinking) for the individual embedded in the collective, in the troubled times live within.
We had some interesting responses – not least from writer and therapist, Susan Holliday whose subsequent essay, As Kingfishers Catch Fire – Self, Ecology and 'mattering', was published last week (and a beautiful thing it is too!).2 Susan’s essay is poetic, insightful and a deep refreshment, at a time when there are so many ‘ideas’ flying around on social media and elsewhere about how to save the world this way and that.
I’ve found myself overwhelmed a little with ideas, to be honest. They are all over the place, yet none of these clever constructions seem to have the slightest effect at macro (or micro) levels on what goes on in the world, right now. I know that this is also the space that Nora Bateson and the Warm Data community works in – between the macro of ‘saving the world’ and the micro of ‘healing the individual’ – and she sees (as does Susan in her essay), the importance of seeing the world as a place where relationships, ecologies and human practice are ever-shifting, ever-changing.
The other thing that writers and authors I admire do best is to pay attention to the aesthetic and poetic, as well as the relational. Nora’s latest book, Combining, is full of art and poetry. Susan’s work is embedded in the therapeutic and the artistic. Susan Cain (author of Quiet) and Nick Cave, infuse their art, writing and thinking with the inspirations of other artists and value the spiritual and are curious about the religious. Naomi Klein brings humanity and love to her analysis and activism. Carlo Rovelli combines his brilliant work in quantum mechanics with stories and a deep awareness of the poetic and the ‘beautiful’.
There is nothing ‘removed’ about their work. They are in the world big-time (and small time). They have something to say about it all, but they don’t work with certainty, because they know that this is not the way that the world works – especially in the world of ‘science’ where it’s understood that this decade’s big idea can - and probably will - always be transcended by the next.
In a recent email conversation with my friend and Unpsychology contributor, Toby Chown, we were discussing this dilemma of mine (that is, my feeling overwhelmed with ideas), and Toby (who is working his way through the very big ideas of Iain McGilchrist at the moment) wrote something that I really related to:
“Ideas can be a bit like sugar - you get a sugar rush and then a come down. Then again, sometimes it feels like there is genuine nourishment from books, and a renewal of inspiration.”
… adding…
“There definitely is such a thing as there being too many ideas ….one thing I like about poetry is how it doesn’t rely on ideas but seeks out experiences and images, which are often harder, but feel more nourishing to share.”
So here we are, at that juncture where there are no more ideas to be shared or talked about (for the time being at least), and where I will post a poem - Slippery Hands3 - that might (or might not) have something to say about being in the world:
Slippery hands
I remember watching you sit there, fierce and fragile, as you dug in your heels, wouldn’t budge or give an inch until you understood the way your pain had embedded itself in the world
And then, when you knew, you took this understanding and made it universal, telling everyone who would listen, these things about love, forgiveness and the nature of fierce spirit
When healing had taken hold, we met and sat, looked each other in the eye, smiled and shared the knowledge we had learned, which is, in the end, the only way two people can ever really meet
Now, in our conversations, insights emerge like solipsisms and striations and playful glimmers of salmon leaping upstream and we, in dialogue, paw at them like bears with slippery hands, hoping for a meal on the edge of winter
I notice we avoid naming things, preferring to let our words slide apart to reveal unspoken revelations that are themselves transitory – then snap shut
We talk on, smiling at what we never knew but now touch with devotion – never knowing who we are, never knowing who we will become
An unnamed thing is passed between us, shaped and reshaped, caressed with the faint trace of an idea. It turns to stone, to smoke, then flows downstream, carries us to where there are ocean currents to ride
There, we become hyperobjects – sticky, sticky – art and evolution dissolved in correlation: old photographs, shared grief and histories
There we become lovers, children, elders, parents, friends, allies – creators of a tangled mess of living and the mesh of dying
There we become nonlinear – slippy, slippy – dropping into a background that is indistinct and fuzzy
this is not magic, but art – you say – something straight out of the real.
(This poem, Slippery Hands, is part of a longer set, provisionally entitled Tangled, to be published in 2024/25.)
Footnotes
Donna Haraway’s book Staying with the Trouble, Making Kin in the Chthulucene, was one of the key jump-off points for the two magazines in our Imaginings edition in 2023.
Susan Halliday’s work can be found at https://www.susanholliday.co.uk, together with information on her book, Hidden Wonders of the Human Heart.
The poem takes its title (and some inspiration) from letters between Bjork and Timothy Morton, which you can find at https://www.dazeddigital.com/music/gallery/20196/0/bjork-s-letters-with-timothy-morton. Morton also came up with the idea of the Hyperobject – an idea about objects that are too big to get our head around, which could explain some of my existential angst about ideas…: https://www.wired.com/story/timothy-morton-hyperobjects-all-the-way-down/
Thanks Steve, for another tender reflection and poem. I recognise this feeling of overwhelm, when ideas come thick and fast and it's hard to know which ones really 'matter' (or if ideas themselves even matter at all). Perhaps we need the poetic to bring us to our senses - perhaps ideas are 'kindlings', flickers of vision that need to be 'tended to', if they are to take hold, if we are to feel their warmth and to see through their light.
I love this sense of the warmth of ideas. John O'Donohue puts this beautifully (as ever!) in his book about celtic wisdom 'Anam Cara': "Most fundamentalism, greed, violence and oppression can be traced back to the separation of ideas and affection. For too long we have been blind to the cognitive riches of feeling and the affective depth of ideas."
Your poem 'Slippery Hands' (beautiful btw) speaks to me of this 'affective depth of ideas'. It suggests to me that our tending of the kindling idea has something to with passing ideas between us, lightly, without grasping or seeking to harden them into concrete truth. This tender and affectionate human exchange of ideas soon sorts out which ones warm the heart (feed and fuel us) and which ones are just cold husks.
I try to remember the importance of this warming exchange in my therapeutic work. Ideas, James Hillman reminds us, are not just 'up in the head'. They don't just 'get in the way' of feeling. In 'Re-visioning Psychology' he underlines the importance of ideas as 'psychic events', as 'experiences relevant for soul'. They are relevant (vital) because they open ways of seeing through experience to the animating source/pattern. It's not 'we' who have important ideas, Hillman suggests, important ideas 'have us'. "We are always in the embrace of an idea", he writes. Now I really like that - to be 'in the embrace' of an idea - much warmer! He also echoes the notion that ideas need to become embodied, taken in, tasted, exchanged (Eros is at work here!). And this 'taking in' seems to be the key to bridging the gap between internal revelation and external change - "when an insight or idea has sunk in, practice invisibly changes'. I hope so. No - I really believe so.
The exchange of ideas which you and the Unpsychology team foster - does matter - it matters particularly for me because of the quality of warmth which is so palpable in these exchanges. Thankyou.
My and my partner's hearts leap when we see the woodpecker is visiting our bird feeder. He ... we can tell this one is a he from the red markings on his back ... does not trust humans, and who can blame him? We stand stock still, lost in wonder, hoping he will stay awhile.
Yesterday, I worked all day on the allotment plot dedicated to growing fresh food to donate to a food bank. I felt a deep sense of belonging with the other volunteers and of knowing how I can be in my right place and time and of service to others.
I don't have a good word to encompass these experiences but still (I feel I should apologise!) I really shy away from attributing the word 'soul' to them. It's not only the old religious associations but also the vague new age use, 'Yeah man, you've got to sort out your soul...' I appreciate the efforts to reclaim the word but for me the negative associations are too strong.
Sense of wonder?
Love and awe?
Can we do without the soul word?
Does anyone else have a sense of profound objection to the soul word, or is it just me?